When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Around 15:41 on August 18, 201, the Defendant filed 112 false reports with C, stating that “A during the dispute with C, which is a driver of the pact-distance signal line at the Daegu hydro-gu Suwon-dong, the Defendant: (a) caused damage to the driver of the spact-gu, Daegu hydro-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, the upper end of the 19:15 on the road; (b) caused damage to the driver of the spact-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, the head of the vehicle in front of the spact-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu, the head of the spact-gu, and damaged the part of the spact-gu, the Defendant made a false statement with the intent of criminal punishment.”

Summary of Evidence

1. C’s legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant (including the part concerning the second, modern, and C statement);

1. A motor vehicle fact certificate;

1. On-site drawings;

1. Records of non-prosecution case and copies of the decision on non-prosecution (No. 2013 type No. 52072);

1. The face, finger photograph, or vehicle damaged photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (report on the details of DNA telephone conversations and report on the confirmation of signal cycle at the scene of accident);

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 156 of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;