However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 29, 2019, at the entrance of B building around 00:50, the Defendant, at the entrance of B building, was in self-defense by viewing the way C (S, 22 years of age), D (V, age limit) and exposing her fat and exposing her gender.

Accordingly, the suspect made a patent obscenity act.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the 112 Reporting Case Handling List;

1. Article 245 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes committed against Order to attend lectures;

1. It shall be decided as ordered on the grounds of Article 56(1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse and Article 59-3(1) of the Welfare of Disabled Persons Act or more;

The reason for sentencing is that the defendant has been sentenced to the suspended sentence of imprisonment with prison labor, in addition to the punishment of three times for the same crime, and that it is not good that the defendant is exposed to the specific women and exposed to the sexual organ.

The victims seem to have caused a considerable sense of sexual humiliation due to the instant crime.

The defendant did not reach an agreement with the victims.

However, the defendant should not repeat the crime in light of his depth, and the defendant's age, character and character, environment, and circumstances after the crime are considered as a whole, and all of the sentencing conditions shown in the arguments in this case shall be sentenced as the disposition.