2. The judgment of the court below is reasonable in full view of all the circumstances that form the conditions for the pleadings and the records of the crime of this case, including the fact that the defendant recognized the crime of this case, the fact that the case was subject to a judgment simultaneously with the crime of embezzlement for which the judgment became final and conclusive, and the degree of the defendant's participation in the crime of this case is not significant compared to other accomplices. However, the crime of this case is the crime of this case by taking advantage of the false lease contract, and the nature of the crime of this case is not good, the recovery of damage or failure, there is no change in circumstances or circumstances that are newly considered in the sentencing after the decision of the court below, and there is no change in the amount of fraud, punishment and equity for the accomplice, the character and conduct of the defendant, the character and conduct of the defendant

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.