If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000.

A person who cooks and sells or provides agricultural and fishery products or the processed products thereof pursuant to the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products shall not place a false indication of the place of origin or place a mark likely to cause confusion therewith.

The Defendant, while operating a general restaurant in the name of “Dcafeteria” in Naju City, provided a large number of unspecified customers who found the above restaurant with a 1,010 km g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g

As a result, the defendant prepared and sold agricultural and fishery products or processed products thereof, and made a false indication of origin or a false indication that may cause confusion.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Legal statement of E;

1. An investigation report (specific quantity in violation of the indication of origin);

1. Details of delivery of cafeteria cafeteria and kimchi;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs on violations;

1. Article 15 of the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products and Articles 6 (2) 1 of the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products and Selection of fines for criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;