강등처분취소
1. On November 25, 2014, the Defendant imposed a surcharge of KRW 2,364,000 on the Plaintiff on the Plaintiff on the part of KRW 2,00,000.
Details of the disposition
The plaintiff was appointed as a policeman on August 5, 1989 and served as a police officer on August 25, 2006, and was promoted to the Inspector on August 25, 2006.
(Classification of police officers’ ranks refers to Article 2 of the Police Officers Act). The Plaintiff is working for the International Criminal Investigation Team of the National Police Agency from February 10, 201 to October 7, 2014;
1. On May 30, 2012, the head of the team in charge of the investigation into the CM fraud case (hereinafter “C”) sent a mobile phone text message from F to F, a former police officer, working at the D police station Economic Team around 07:59 on May 30, 2012, who was working for the D police station E, and was working as the hub of the instant case on the suspect E (hereinafter “instant company”) at the U.S. branch office upon the request of F, upon the request of F, to verify whether the sender was a person who sent the mail submitted as evidence of the suspect E-related accusation case, and leaked the fraud by sending the mobile phone text message to F (hereinafter “Disciplinary Reason 1”);
2. On November 22, 2012, H, who was examined as a witness, did not verify the facts even though he/she stated that the evidence was not sent, and did not verify the facts, and returned 10 boxes of evidence in the U.S. branch office of the instant company without due process, on the ground that the evidence was identical to the name of the person who was admitted to the evidence (hereinafter “Disciplinary Reason 2”) by returning it to the U.S. branch office of the instant company without due process (hereinafter “Disciplinary Reason 2”).
3. Although the investigation of the case in which seven persons, including the complainant I, filed a criminal suspect E was under way, at around 19:00 on June 28, 2012, at the “K” restaurant in Gangnam-gu, “K” received entertainment by receiving food equivalent to KRW 32,00 from the suspect E, who is a job-related person, in contact with F, or 32,00 won (hereinafter “Disciplinary Reason 3”), and around September 2012, at the safety zone prior to the Gangnam-gu Police Station, F, in an amount equivalent to KRW 1.82,00,000,000 in total, including receiving KRW 1,50,000 and KRW 1.82,000 in the market price.
§ 4.