2. Although there are favorable circumstances such as the fact that the defendant divided his mistake into one and reflects the defendant, the defendant has been punished for the same crime several times on September 18, 2009, and in particular, the defendant committed the crime of this case in spite of the fact that he was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year and six months on September 18, 2009 due to a crime similar to the crime of this case in the Busan District Court Branch Branch of Incheon District Court, which was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on September 18, 2009, and the defendant did not make an agreement with the victims up to the trial because he did not make a serious effort for the repayment of damage, and in light of the motive and background leading up to the crime of this case, the situation after the crime of this case, and other various sentencing conditions in the records, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, it is not recognized that the sentencing of the court below is too unreasonable.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the defendant's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per

(However, in accordance with Article 25 (1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, it shall be corrected that " September 26, 2009" was changed to " September 18, 2009."