손해배상(자)
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation of this case is as follows, except for the case’s “2..........” part of the judgment of the court of first instance (Articles 20 to 3, 10) is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
In full view of the purport of the argument in the statement No. 2 of the judgment No. 2 of the court below, the part of the judgment of 2. 1. 16:10 on December 5, 2013, the plaintiff driving the 124cc Orala and driving the c. C 124cc-c. on December 5, 2013 and driving the c.124cc road in the Dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-car and the part of the plaintiff's her driving on
The plaintiff's argument is acknowledged. However, since the report on the engineering analysis (Evidence A No. 5) of the automobile accident as shown in the plaintiff's argument is merely a document prepared by the plaintiff's personal request and it cannot guarantee objectivity, it is difficult to use it as evidence for recognition. The remaining evidence submitted by the plaintiff alone is insufficient to view that the defendant's vehicle goes beyond the plaintiff's right-hand part in the course of overtaking the plaintiff's vehicle, or that the part of the right-hand part of the defendant's driver's vehicle was transferred to the plaintiff's left-hand side due to the shock of the plaintiff, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it, the plaintiff's argument cannot be accepted. Rather, in light of the following circumstances, the plaintiff's argument is not acceptable. Rather, the plaintiff's statement No. 4-5 (Appraisal Report), No. 6 (Investigation Report), No. 1-5 (Statement Report), No. 1-2 (Statement Report) and No. 1-2 (In each of the reasons for non-prosecution and the whole purport of the plaintiff's argument in the