The defendant is the starting money of the victim D(V, 26 years old).

On July 29, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 09:20, around Yongsan-gu in Seoul, Yongsan-gu in Seoul; (b) around 102 Dong 408; (c) prevented the victim of the Hain from carrying his son F (seven months after his son was born) and moving his son, and (d) caused his son to carry his son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s kin, and

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged parts;

1. Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to criminal facts, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act of the choice of punishment, and the selection of fines [ difficult to view that Defendant’s act constitutes a justifiable act that does not violate social rules solely on the sole basis that Defendant asserts in light of the degree of injury he/she could know by compiling evidence

1. A fine not exceeding 500,000 won to be suspended;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 59(1)(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Sentence (hereinafter the following circumstances) are the Defendant’s primary offender; the victim is in the aspect of inducing the instant crime; there are circumstances to be considered in the motive of the crime; the damage is not serious; and other circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as shown in the instant pleadings, including the Defendant’s age and circumstances after the crime, are considered. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all.