except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On January 11, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 23:20, around 23:20, 2014, the Victim E (the 32 years of age) wing wing to F, the Defendant, the deniedr of the Defendant; (b) the Defendant wing wing to the Defendant, and the instant F was incurred; (c) the Defendant wing wing wing to the Victim; and (d) the victim wing wing her head, who was on the part of the Victim’s body, going beyond the Defendant’s head, went back to the Defendant’s body, and was on the victim’s head, who was in danger to the victim’s face by drinking wing her head.

As a result, the defendant suffered bodily injury, such as two diagnosis and injury, which require three weeks of medical treatment, as an injury to the victim, which is a dangerous object.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The part of each statement about E and F among the police interrogation protocol of the defendant against the defendant

1. G statements;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to field photographs, damaged part photographs (E), shouldered part of the disease of a shoulderer;

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of inflicting an injury on a dangerous object);

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the ground that Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the fact that the defendant is against all the facts of the crime, the agreement is reached with the victim, the circumstances leading to the crime of this case may be considered, the contents of the crime, etc.) is above the scope of Article 6