2. The judgment of the court below is recognized that the defendant made a confession of all crimes, and his mistake is divided in depth, and that the defendant is presumed to have committed a contingency crime under the influence of alcohol while suffering from her dependence on alcohol due to unmarried family members or her unmarried family members under 47 years of age while living together with her family members or her parents without any relationship, and that the victims are in the preference of the defendant by mutual consent between the victims and the victims.

However, in light of the form and method of the crime of this case, the crime of this case is bad, in particular, the victim filed 112 reports by leaving the c cafeteria operated by the victim E, and the police tried to find 112 reports annually from the next day after they were called up and returned to the c cafeteria, or repeatedly demanded cancellation of the complaint, and there was a history of criminal punishment for the same crime, and the crime of this case was committed again without being aware of the period of repeated crime even though they were released from the prison after having been sentenced to punishment for the same crime against the victims, and even after having been discharged from the prison, the defendant committed the crime of this case without being aware of the period of repeated crime, and the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive, means and result of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc., and the scope of recommended sentencing guidelines for the enactment of the Sentencing committee, the court below's punishment is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.