소유권말소등기
1. The plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
1. Basic facts
A. Each real estate listed in the separate sheet 1 to 3 was jointly owned by the network H and the network I at the 1/2 share ratio, but the network H died on February 24, 1982, and the Plaintiffs are some of the heirs of the network H.
B. Defendant C, D, and Nonparty J, K, and L completed the registration of ownership transfer in accordance with the former Act on Special Measures for the Registration of Ownership of Real Estate (hereinafter “Special Measures Act”) with respect to each of 1/10 shares of 1/2 of the respective shares of 1/10 of the real estate listed in the separate sheet 1 and 2, and the above registration of ownership transfer was completed in accordance with the guarantor’s guarantee that Defendant C, D, and Nonparty J, K, and L purchased the said land from the deceased H and LI on August 30, 1983 and actually owned it.
C. Defendant D and Nonparty J, M, N, and K completed the registration of ownership transfer in accordance with the special provisions on each portion of 1/5 with respect to the real estate listed in the separate sheet 3 attached hereto. The above registration of ownership transfer was completed in accordance with the letter of guarantee of the guarantor to the effect that Defendant D and Nonparty J, M, N, and K purchased the above land from the network H and network I on August 30, 1983 and actually owned it.
J died on July 13, 2016, and there was Defendant F and G, the spouse of the deceased, as the inheritor of the deceased.
【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there is no dispute, Gap's 1 through 5 evidence, Eul's 1 evidence (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The parties' assertion
A. Although Defendant C, D, and deceased J did not purchase each real estate listed in the separate list 1 through 3 from the Plaintiffs, their father, who is the heir of the deceased H and deceased H, they completed the registration of transfer of ownership pursuant to the Special Act according to a false guarantee certificate, and thus, the above registration of transfer of ownership is invalid. Thus, the Defendants are registered to the Plaintiffs, who are the heir of the deceased H, as indicated in the purport of the claim.