사기
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
The defendant 510,00 won to C who is an applicant for compensation, 3,496,00 won to D, and 5,00 won to E.
Punishment of the crime
[criminal record] On November 7, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment by fraud at the Suwon District Court, and eight months of imprisonment by fraud at the same court on May 30, 2013, and on December 16, 2013, the Defendant completed the execution of each of the above punishment at the Seoul Southern Prison.
[2015 Highest 484]
1. On June 5, 2014, the Defendant, against the victim F, the victim C, the victim D, and the victim E, made a false statement to the victim F, who prepared a notice to the effect that “the Internet site” is “to seek Japaneseization” on the Internet page of the Internet site, that the victim F, who sold the UNFCCC.
However, in fact, the Defendant did not have a procedure to sell to the victim, and even if the Defendant received money from the victim as the purchase price of the purchase price of the purchase price of the purchase price of the purchase price, there was no intention or ability to deliver the purchase price to the victim.
The Defendant received KRW 400,00,00 from the victim’s foreign exchange bank account in the name of the Defendant on the same day and received KRW 12,476,00 from that time through July 14, 2014, by deceiving the victims by the above methods as indicated in the list of crimes, and received a total of KRW 12,476,00 from the victims eight times in total.
Accordingly, the defendant was informed of the victims to receive each property.
2. On July 24, 2014, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “the victim would exchange our money into Singapore,” while dialogueing the victim G with the victim and the cell phone fluor Kakaook, located at H 4 stories in Gyeonggi-do, Gyeonggi-do, with the victim at H 106.”
However, there was no intention or ability to exchange money into Singapore even if the defendant received money from the victim in the name of the money exchange for Singapore because the defendant did not have the money exchange to the victim.
On the same day, the defendant paid for the exchange of Singapore from the victim.