성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Criminal facts
The Defendant operated a sexual traffic business establishment under the trade name "C" in the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Btel 419.
On August 12, 2017, the Defendant, at around 20:00, waiting the instant officetel to D, a female employee, and arranged commercial sex acts by having the Defendant receive 100,000 won of sexual sex acts from the F who reported public relations writing at the Internet website “E” and received the payment for sexual intercourse with the said D.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police suspect against D or F;
1. Application of statutes on site photographs;
1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of elective sexual traffic for facts constituting an offense and Article 19 of the Act on the Punishment of such Acts;
1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;
1. The act of arranging sexual traffic for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act requires strict eradication as it has considerable social harm, such as putting women's sex into commercialization and undermining sound sexual culture and good morals, etc. Considering the fact that the defendant conducts sexual traffic intermediary business in a systematic manner, such as employing women in sexual traffic, advertising commercial establishments using the Internet site, renting officetels and renting officetels as a place of sexual traffic, and using it as a place of sexual traffic, etc., the defendant's liability is not less than the defendant's criminal liability.
However, the defendant's intention to commit the crime of this case is against the mistake, the period of the brokerage business of this case is not long and the profits acquired by the defendant from the crime of this case seems not to be significant, the defendant does not have the same criminal record, the defendant does not have the same criminal record, the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime of this case, and all of the sentencing conditions shown in the records and changes theory, such as the circumstances after the crime, shall be determined as ordered by the order.