When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving Obaba in B.

On February 26, 2016, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 21:40, and driven the two-lanes of the D cafeteria located in Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-si, at a speed that is impossible to identify the two-lanes of the D cafeteria from the long-distance outflow to the long-distance outflow.

Since a crosswalk is installed at a front door, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to temporarily stop in front of the crosswalk and protect pedestrians, and to accurately manipulate the front door and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right of the driver, and to safely drive the brake and the steering gear.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and went beyond the victim E (the age of 55) who was walking along the Madern crosswalk as it was due to the negligence of the Defendant.

As a result, the Defendant suffered from the above occupational negligence that caused approximately two weeks of medical treatment to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the occurrence status of E traffic accidents;

1. Entry of the traffic accident report;

1. (1) Statements and images of a traffic accident report;

1. Descriptions of a medical certificate;

1. Application of video-related Acts and subordinate statutes to the scene of an accident and photographs of accident vehicles;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment Order is that the defendant shocked the victim who suffered the injury by shocking the victim, that the defendant has a record of being sentenced to five times a fine due to the same and a different crime, that the defendant was not agreed with the victim, and that the vehicle of the defendant was not covered by the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment Order (only a liability insurance). Meanwhile, the injury the victim sustained.