2. In full view of all the factors of sentencing, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence of the lower court is too uneasible and unreasonable, in light of the following factors: (a) the Defendant was committed at a disadvantage; (b) the Defendant was led to the Defendant’s confession; (c) the amount of defraudation was not significant; and (d) the victim J does not want punishment against the Defendant upon full repayment of taxi charges; and (e) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, circumstances after the crime.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.