However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant leased No. 313 of Daejeon Seo-gu building B and operated a commercial sex trafficking business establishment under the trade name of "C".

On May 19, 2016, the Defendant, at the above “C” business establishment around 15:00 on May 19, 2016, ordered employees D (n, 25 years of age) to receive KRW 1.30,000 as the price for sexual traffic from a male in his/her name, and assisted the said D to engage in sexual intercourse with E in the same manner as at around 16:00 on the same day.

Accordingly, the defendant arranged sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the police against D or E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on seizure records;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of elective sexual traffic concerning facts constituting an offense and Article 19 (2) 1 of the same Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (such as the fact that there is no previous conviction exceeding a fine, the period of operation is extremely short and the amount of operating income is not yet definite, and the fact that it is against nature);

1. Protective observation and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;