The Defendant was a person who was a protruding machine with “B” online game, and the victim C(30) was a person who worked in the cream with “E” at the “D” team of the said amateur game, and the victim was a situation where there was conflict between the Defendant and the Plaintiff’s withdrawal from the “F” online community related to the said game.

On July 19, 2017, the defendant referred to the victim by using a mobile phone in the residence of the defendant in Seo-gu Daejeon Daejeon, Daejeon on July 22:53, 2017, and used the mobile phone and used the mobile phone as the "B

D 20 20 20

E. A. B. A. B. a person in the form of mistake in the terms of influence after the back investigation. A. A. A. B, without having to escape from Chinese capital, is the quality of A. B, without having to go to the game room, by entering the instant lower case. H players also answer to the past fluence of the same damage. He also registered the Defendant’s P. B.C. page in the Defendant’s page, thereby openly insulting the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the complaint and statement protocol;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. A fine not exceeding 300,000 won to be suspended;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act of the Suspension of Pronouncement of Sentence (see, e.g., Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2007Do1488, Apr. 2, 2007) (see, 201; Supreme Court Decision 200Do1435, Apr. 2, 2008) (see, 201;