When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On September 19, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 13:35 on September 19, 2016, sent tobacco to the “D convenience store” operated by the victim C in Busan Northern-gu B; and (b) discovered that tobacco was on the table of the consignor in front of the calculation stand and taken a theft.

Accordingly, the Defendant calculated only 1% of the soften tobacco, which was collected by inserting it to the right hand hand, and was collected by inserting it to the fluor's right hand, by inserting it to the fluor's right hand, among the tobacco 4 A on the table, in which a female employee in a cluter was fluor and fluor's fluor's fluor's fluor.

Accordingly, the Defendant stolen the Plaintiff’s total market price of KRW 9,00,000, 20 tobacco in the recognition business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the police statement protocol law to C

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the choice of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act requires the reduction of the amount of fine determined by a summary order by taking into account all the circumstances indicated in the record, such as the following: (a) the Defendant was the primary offender; and (b) the damage was minor and the damage was fully recovered; and (c) the sentence is determined as ordered.