The Defendants conspired to commit fraud against the victim G using the equipment that read and inform the victim G of the fact that the Defendants read the name “F”, the name-free and special luminous substance added with the lusor and the lusoric lusor and the lusoric lusor and the lusoric lusor.

On April 15, 2014, from around 21:30 to 01:30 on the following day, the first house located in J, “F,” “F,” “F,” and “F,” the Defendants and F, together with the victims of 20 name cards, have used 20 boxes containing special mining substances, to gambling “total books”, using 20 bits containing special mining substances, and the Defendant, using the machinery installed, read the bits, thereby informing “F” of the bits through the lusic vibration, and the Defendants, by means of raising money to the lusic dose in accordance with “F,” and defraudeded the 84.8 million won in total from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ partial statements in the first trial record;

1. Defendants’ partial statement on the date of the second trial at each court

1. Each legal statement of witness G, J and K;

1. Some prosecutorial suspect interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. Each police statement to G, J and K;

1. Photographs photographs of the projected plane;

1. Seizure records;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (verification as to whether it is speculation);

1. Articles 347 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

1. The reason [the range of recommending punishment] for sentencing a sentence of choice of imprisonment with prison labor [the range of recommending punishment] General Fraud (10 million won or less) (1-1 year or year)] where the victim is fully responsible for the occurrence of a crime or the expansion of damage, and where the victim is not subject to punishment or whose considerable damage has been recovered, or where the crime was committed by deceiving the court in a trial procedure] - In a case where the crime was committed in a very poor manner or by deceiving the court in a trial procedure, there is a possibility of criticism by deceiving the victim of a large amount of money by taking advantage of a fraudulent gambling in which special equipment has been mobilized.