However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 4, 2018, the Defendant: (a) received KRW 90,00 from F, male, and engaged in sexual intercourse with F, one time with F, and engaged in sexual intercourse at a maid room located in Daegu Northern-gu, Daegu, via “E” in a “Del” c, thereby having received KRW 90,00 from F, male, and engaged in sexual intercourse.

On January 31, 2018, from around 01:00 to 02:00, the Defendant received 58,000 won in cash from the J which continued to engage in sexual intercourse with the Defendant on a single-time basis by receiving KRW 58,00,00 from the Hel located in the Daegu-gu Hel through “I” in the Hel located in Daegu-gu G.

Summary of Evidence

"2018 Highest 1290"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect with respect to F;

1. Report on internal investigation (the sequence 4, 5 in the list of evidence) 2018, 1448;

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the police against J;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing K photographic;

1. Article 21 (1) of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc., and Selection of Imprisonment with labor for an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62 (1) of the same Act (Article 62 (1) of the same Act on the grounds that there are many criminal records of the defendant for the same type of punishment, but the defendant's wrong recognition of his/her misconduct and reflects the fact that he/she will start a new work, such as assistance to activities of persons with disabilities,