However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

From October 2, 2013 to December 23:30 of the same month, the Defendant installed 13 game 's 's 'spin-fin-fin-fin-fin-fin-fin-fin-fin-fin-fin-fin-fin-fin-fin-fin-fin-fin-fin-fin-fin-fin-fat-fin-fin-fat-fin-fin-fin-fin-fat-fin-fin-fin-fin-fin-fin-fin-fin-fin-f3

Accordingly, the defendant was engaged in speculative activities as a business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D and E;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing appraisal and reply;

1. Article 30 (1) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Regulation and Punishment of Specific Crimes, such as Relevant Provisions of the relevant Acts and selective speculative acts, etc.; Selection of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act: Consideration of various circumstances, such as the number of game instruments and duration of business established by the defendant, and other conditions for sentencing indicated in the records, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, occupation and family environment, in light of the fact that speculative business is a crime that undermines sound social formation: The defendant has no previous conviction, other than one time fine, and the defendant has committed a crime;