2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The parties concerned are companies with the purpose of acquiring securitization assets under the Asset-Backed Securitization Act, etc. B (the representative C, hereinafter “B”), D Co., Ltd. (the representative C, hereinafter “D”), and E Co., Ltd. (the “E”) are companies with the purpose of manufacturing and selling each wire, and G (the father of the above C) is substantially operating B and D.

B. On February 17, 2011, the Plaintiff, B, etc., entered the contract for a loan for consumption of money and the contract for establishing a security for transfer (hereinafter “VOE”) into with the machinery and tools listed in the attached Table 1 [Attachment I, J, and 9, which were owned by B in the auction procedure for H real estate rent of H in this Court, and the attached Table I, J, and J-based factory building and factory building] in the above case.

Since then, G requested the Plaintiff to lend money from the Foreign Service Center for the purchase of the machinery listed in the attached Table 1 list, and the Plaintiff, on September 8, 2011, as the Plaintiff lent KRW 200 million to B and D on September 7, 201, set up a notarial deed of a monetary loan agreement (No. 1191, No. 1191, No. 201, No. 1191, No. 1191, Sept. 2, 201) that contains such contents.

At the same time, the Plaintiff entered into a contract for transfer security (hereinafter “instant contract for transfer security”) with respect to the machinery listed in the attached Table 2 [Attachment No. 4-2] [Attachment No. 1] of the appraisal document (attached Table No. 4-2) prepared by a senior certified public appraiser office in the above H case, which contains the same content as of September 8, 201, in order to secure a loan claim of KRW 200 million, the Plaintiff entered into a contract for transfer security (hereinafter “instant contract for transfer security”).