When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 19:30 on October 24, 2014, the Defendant damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts on the part of the victim F, the victim’s children G, the victim’s children G, the victim’s husband I, and redevelopment employees, who had not lived with the Defendant’s f, the f, the f, the f, the f, the f, the f, the f, the victim’s children H, the f, the f, the f, the husband of the victim’s f, and the redevelopment employees, who had lived with the f, the f, the f, the f, and the f, the f, and the f, the f, the f, the f, and the f, the f, the f

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Application of each statute on witness D, G, F, and I’s respective legal statements;

1. Relevant Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. In full view of all the circumstances such as the circumstance and degree of the crime committed by the defendant on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order, the age, character, conduct and environment, etc. of the defendant, the punishment as ordered shall be determined.