A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On September 22, 2015, from around 01:25, to around 01:45, Defendant A obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force by following the following: (a) on the F restaurant run by the victim E in Pyeongtaek-si from around 01:25 to around 01:45 on the same day; (b) on the ground that the Defendant took a bath to his her pet C, and the Defendant took an answer to the pet; (c) thus, the Defendant took a bath to deem the victim “clicker Ba.................” and (d) the Defendant interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force: (a) exposing a string

2. Defendant C committed assaulting the police officer’s legitimate performance of official duties in relation to criminal investigations by assaulting the police officer’s face and body, such as the police officer H, belonging to the G District at Pyeongtaek-gu Police Station G District G District, which is arrested pets A as a flagrant offender of interfering with his/her duties at the time and place described in paragraph (1).

2. The Defendant: (a) was arrested as a flagrant offender in obstruction of business by the superintendent of the police station at Pyeongtaek Police Station G District for the foregoing reasons, for the foregoing reasons, Defendant B’s request that the restaurant owner E, under the influence of alcohol at the place, changed wages; and (b) was arrested as a frighter in the act of interference with business by the superintendent of the police station belonging to Pyeongtaek Police Station G District for the foregoing reasons; (c) “this frighter flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick; and (d) flick fl the face of the police station belonging to the same police station.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Each prosecutor's interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. Each police statement of E and H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the I;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts A A: Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (Selection of Imprisonment) O Defendant B and C: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (Selection of Fine);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act (Defendant B and C) of the ordinary concurrence (Defendant B and C)