beta
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.12.24 2015누37367

부정당업자제재처분취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance that cited this case is identical to the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal as follows, and thus, it shall be cited as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Following the first instance court's 7th 1 line "(6)", "G is called N. G. The employees of the Plaintiff" added. (2) P. 8th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 8th 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 201, as follows. (8) According to the Defendant's Cooperation Company for Power Distribution Corporation (Evidence A2) and the Guidelines for the Net Inspection of Power Line (Evidence B 15th 15), the Defendant may contract for the cooperation company in charge of the inspection of the opening and closing line of the electric distribution line (i.e., construction work which falls under the Guidelines for 10th 6th 1st 6th 1st 202th 6th 206th 1st 206th 6th 206th 206th 206th 1st 206th 206th 1st 206th 1st 6th 206th 6th 3th 206th 3rd 2.

In addition, G falls under the Emergency Works on January 14, 2013.