For the reasons indicated in its reasoning, the lower court upheld the first instance judgment that acquitted the charges of this case on the grounds that there is no proof of crime.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and records, the lower court did not err in its judgment by misapprehending the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine as to the negligence of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and the violation of the Road Traffic Act.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.