However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 05:30 on June 15, 2017, the Defendant: (a) was between the victim H (47 tax) and the workplace club fee; (b) was under drinking together at the main point of “J” located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul; (c) was frighting the victim’s face, etc.; (d) was frighting the victim’s face, etc.; and (e) was frighting the victim’s face, which is a dangerous thing that had been located therein; and (e) was frighting the victim to “brising the victim,” and (e) was frighting the number of days of treatment, etc. on the face of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to K and H;

1. Lritten statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the spot and damaged photographs;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The sentence as ordered shall be imposed in consideration of the following circumstances: (a) the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence under the Criminal Act: (b) the fact that the defendant recognized and reflected the crime; (c) the defendant agreed with the victim; (d) the defendant has no record of committing the crime; and (e) the defendant’s age, sex, criminal conduct, environment, family relationship; (e) the motive and consequence of the crime; and (e) the circumstances surrounding the sentencing