When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On July 7, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 20:35, the Defendant: (b) called the “Dcafeteria” operated by the victim C, which was operated by the victim C, as the “C,” and then set off the inner wall into the small-scale bottle, which is a dangerous object in the said restaurant, twice, and damaged the wall so that the repair cost of KRW 1,100,000,000,000 can be reduced; and (c) obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force at the entrance of the entrance, thereby obstructing the victim’s restaurant business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on internal investigation and a report on investigation (written estimate to be submitted by a victim);

1. Relevant Article 369 (1) and 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;