On December 18, 2016, the Defendant would offer 2.5 million won per month when he/she lends his/her account for tax issues from a person in an influence to his/her name.

“On the phone call to the effect that “, around that time, each of the above accounts was sent to Nonindicted 2 (C and D), via Kwikset Service Articles in the name of the Defendant, and around that time, notified the Defendant of the password via the phone. Around that time, each of the above accounts was sent to Nonindicted 2 (C and D) of the Busan Bank’s name via Kwikset Service Articles.

Accordingly, the Defendant promised to pay the price, and lent the approaching media.

2. According to the records of this case, on September 27, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 2,00,000 to a violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act and confirmed on October 6, 10 of the same month (the Busan District Court Decision 2017 High Court Decision 1539; hereinafter “transfer”) and the Defendant transferred the transfer account to the investigative agency of the previous case and the investigative agency of this case on November 2016, respectively, but the Defendant confirmed the fact that the account was kept on the next day, without accurately memorying the account number.

The facts stated. ③ The crime of the previous case was committed by the Defendant on November 2016, 201 to receive 3 million won from his person in the name in front of the Busan Young-gu E-do, Busan, his residence, and the Defendant sent the physical card 2 and passwords connected to the Busan bank account (Account Number F) in the name of the Defendant through Kwikset Service Articles. The date and time of the crime in this case are the same until the public prosecutor changes the indictment.