A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

In full view of all the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case, and the criminal defendant did not have criminal records of the same kind or imprisonment without prison labor or any heavier punishment, and the fact that all victims have reached an agreement at the time of trial, the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable

Therefore, since the defendant's appeal is well-grounded, the judgment of the court below is reversed pursuant to Article 364 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the following is ruled again.

Criminal facts

The summary of the evidence and the criminal facts of the defendant recognized by this court and the summary of the evidence are the same as the corresponding columns of the judgment of the court below, and thus, they shall be quoted by Article 369 of the Criminal Procedure Act

Application of Statutes

1. Article 5-11 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Articles 148-2 (2) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision on the Grounds for Appeal);

1. Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Probation, etc. Act;