except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person working as a security team in the Seo-gu building in Gwangju.

At around 18:30 on July 8, 2018, the Defendant: (a) committed a theft with a malone set of the victim-owned GX7 camera in the first floor of the building B, which was located in the display stand, in which all of the above salesroom employees retired from office and there was a gap in the value of 1,049,000 won which was located in the display stand.

From around that time to July 23, 2018, the Defendant stolen 6 Kamera in total amounting to KRW 9,285,000, which is the victim’s market price at the same place as indicated in the attached list of crimes, at the same time and at the same time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. On-site photographs and damaged objects of the case;

1. Application of CCTV image photograph Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 329 of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act - Reasons for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the suspended sentence - The fact that the defendant has recognized his/her mistake, the fact that the defendant has agreed with the victim - The defendant has been punished twice for larceny in 2017;