A. At the time of the instant case, the Defendant did not have been dead at the time of the E’s creaming.

B. The sentence of the lower court (one million won) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. (1) On November 30, 2015, the summary of the instant facts charged: (a) around November 30, 2015, the Defendant left the instant charges after having the victim E (39) who is a representative engineer and the Si c stop the vehicle to the victim on the front of the “D” restaurant located in the Nam-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Nam-gu, Gwangju; and (b) having the victim stop the vehicle.

Since then, while the defendant has been in a dispute with the victim, he was placed at the right hand of the victim's left side, and the "hump spawal spawals and spawals" requires approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim.

2) The lower court determined that the Defendant was at the time of the instant case, on the grounds delineated below.

The decision was determined.

As a result of viewing the video CD of the black box, the circumstances associated with the facts charged of this case committed outside the vehicle do not be recorded, but the horses, bathings, and the Defendant, which are recorded by the victim and the Defendant, and the victim inside the vehicle, are stopped and stopped by the vehicle, and the Defendant’s sound refers to the victim “(d).” The vehicle stopped, the Defendant’s sound read as “packer and kh.”, the Defendant’s sound to open the door, “h.”, the Defendant’s strong language,” and the Defendant’s strong language.

하지 말고 ”라고 말하는 소리, 그와 동시에 가벼운 타격 음과 함께 피해자가 ‘ 아~ ’라고 내뱉는 소리, 피고인이 “ 자식아, 이 버릇없는 자식이 ”라고 말하는 소리, 피해자가 “ 뺨 때렸어, 빰 때렸어 ”라고 말하는 소리, 피해자가 극도로 흥분하여 경찰에 신고하겠다며 말리지 말라는 취지로 말하는 소리, 피해자가 경찰에 전화하여 신고하는 내용이 차례대로 녹음되어 있다.

The contents of this recording are mostly consistent with the police statements of the victim, and the defendant is the victim.