손해배상(기)
All appeals by the plaintiffs are dismissed.
The costs of appeal are assessed against the plaintiffs.
The judgment of the court of first instance is ordered.
1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows. The part in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance stating " Defendant L" or "L" in the part in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as "Defendant H" or "H", and as "attached 11" in the 5th page, "attached 10", and the plaintiff's additional assertion is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the case where the plaintiff's additional assertion is determined in this court as follows. Thus, it is cited in accordance with the main sentence of
2. Additional determination
A. In addition, the plaintiffs' assertion 1) civil liability and criminal liability are separately examined from a different point of view. Thus, if the plaintiffs' personality rights were infringed even in cases of mere infringement of reputation, not a social evaluation, it constitutes tort under the Civil Act. Therefore, the part of defamation and insult (attached Form 16, 16, 7, 18, 10, 10) other Defendants' remainder of defamation and insult (Defendant C: 17, 9, 13, 14, 8, 10, 12, 13, 13, 14, 13, 11, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 14, 10, 10, 14, and 8) other Defendants' remaining defamation and insult (Defendant C: 17, 10, 100, 10, 10, 10, 201) should be recognized.
B. Although the Civil Act does not explicitly provide for the establishment of tort due to defamation or insult in any case, it is desirable to regard defamation, etc. under the Civil Act as identical to defamation or insult under the Criminal Act from the perspective of consistency of legal terms and uniformity of legal system.