On November 21, 2012, at least 19:30, the Defendants jointly attended a resident public hearing held at the apartment household located in the instant apartment household (hereinafter “instant public hearing”) and held 30 persons, including the representative of the Dong and the residents, etc. of the instant apartment, and, “B was punished by a fine by the chairman before D apartment 12,” and “the former president purchased the bbbbs from the outside and embezzled the difference of KRW 300,000 by purchasing the bscen from the outside while purchasing the bscens,” and “disembling the food expenses by calculating the food expenses,” and “the principal expenses of the individual vehicle was disbursed from the operating expenses” (hereinafter “the instant printed materials”) stating that the Defendant A distributed the printed materials to the residents present at the instant apartment household located in the instant apartment household, and Defendant B made public reading by openly pointing this fact to damage the honor of the victim by openly pointing out the materials owned by the victim and made it included in the repair work in the instant materials.”

2. The Defendants were present at the public hearing of this case, and distributed the instant printed materials or read them, and did not directly participate in the preparation of the instant printed materials. Thus, there was no intention to impair the honor of the victim through the instant printed materials.

In addition, the contents of the instant printed matter are true, and the Defendants are the public interest of the apartment residents of this case.