However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a bus of C's bus.

On May 5, 2018, the Defendant came to turn to the left at a speed of about 36 km per hour, depending on the first apartment in the direction of the Filial Elementary School at the direction of the Filial Elementary School, the road of the 11-lane in the direction of the Pudong 34, the direction of the Pudong 11, the direction of the Filial Elementary School at the speed of about 36 km.

Since there is an intersection where a signal, etc. is installed, there was a duty of care to safely turn to the left after confirming whether a person engaged in driving service has a way to reduce the speed and to see well the right and the right and the right and the right of the road.

Nevertheless, by negligence, the defendant neglected to turn to the left and found the victim D (49), E (49 years of age), F (n, 22 years of age) who cross the crosswalk from the left side to the right side pursuant to the pedestrian signals, and did not go to the ground by finding the victim D (49 years of age), E (n, 49 years of age), and F (n, 22 years of age). On the other hand, the defendant continued to go to the front side of the bus of the defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, by such occupational negligence, an injury to the victim D, such as a balone-time aggregate in need of treatment for about 8 weeks, an injury to the victim E, such as a balone’s balone balone of the balone of the mouths requiring treatment for about 4 weeks, and an injury to the victim F, such as a balone balone dalone, requiring treatment for about 2 weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement of D, E, and F;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of a credit cooperative without prison labor for punishment;

1. The following circumstances are favorable to the defendant for the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act.