However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On November 1, 2015, the Defendant posted a notice to the effect that “I would be given a superior level on the Internet daily bulletin bulletin board Blub Blub Blub Blub Bludr.” On November 1, 2015, the Defendant would have the victim C who reported and contacted with it receive a superior level by causing the game to be given a superior level by instead of remitting money by using the internal mail inside the said game.

A false statement was made.

However, the Defendant, around that time, lives at a house where parents were living together with her parents and a soup and soup brying room, and there is a lack of living expenses, thus doing so to the same effect against a large number of ribrrrrrr's games and receive a higher level.

Although there was no property in possession or income, there was no intention or ability to make the victim receive money from the damaged person in the state of insufficient cost-raising for game operations due to lack of certain income, but there was no intention or ability to make the victim receive money from the injured person.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and acquired 60,000 won from the victim on November 1, 2015.

In addition, from August 20, 2015 to March 1, 2016, the Defendant received a total of KRW 878,500 from around August 20, 2015 to around March 1, 2016, and acquired it by remittance against the total of 15 victims, such as the list of crimes in the attached Form.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each written petition and each written statement;

1. A report on investigation (or confirmation as relative to a victim);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on transactions;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of punishment for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (General Consideration as follows):

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on the observation of protection and observation is that the defendant will link the game as stated in his/her judgment to his/her substitute for grades;

A large number of members.