해임처분취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Basic facts
A. On January 1, 1997, the Plaintiff was appointed as a philosolosophical and full-time lecturer at B University, a national university, as a professor on April 1, 2009, and served as a philosolosolosolo and a professor at B University.
B. On April 21, 2014, the Defendant demanded a disciplinary resolution against the Plaintiff to the General Disciplinary Committee on Public Educational Officials at B University. On May 2, 2014, the Defendant issued a dismissal disposition against the Plaintiff pursuant to Article 78(1) of the State Public Officials Act (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff committed the following misconduct (hereinafter “instant misconduct”) and violated Articles 56 (Duty of Fidelity), 58 (Prohibition of Deserting from Office), and 63 (Duty to Maintain Dignity) of the State Public Officials Act.
[1] In 209, the Plaintiff promised to prevent recurrence of the same day by causing an inappropriate monetary relation with graduate students. Although the Plaintiff was subject to disciplinary action by impairing the dignity of public educational officials and impairing the honor of the university due to similar incidents in 2010, the Plaintiff demanded a student who applied for a Chinese philosophical course in a semester in February 2014, 2014 by using telephone and telephone and text, and some students (six students) deposit KRW 1,530,000 in total from 30,000 to 950,000,000 won notified by the Plaintiff. In addition, from November 1, 2013 to 1 semester 2014, the Plaintiff requested a student who participated in Chinese philosophical course to use information by means of personal loan and text for the purpose of using money transfer (including personal loan and text).