A. The Plaintiff is a company that engages in wholesale and retail business, etc., and I is a painting business operated by J and H, its husband, together.

B. On August 19, 2016, the Plaintiff, from J, issued to the Defendants a notice of assignment of credit that each of the above credit amounts would be paid to the Plaintiff, since the Plaintiff received KRW 15 million from J to Defendant C (representative of K), KRW 10 million against Defendant D (hereinafter “Defendant D”)’s credit amount, KRW 15 million against Defendant E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant E”), KRW 6 million against Defendant F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant F”), and KRW 15 million against Defendant G (hereinafter “Defendant G”)’s credit amount.

C. On August 12, 2016, the Plaintiff sent each of the above notice of assignment of claims along with a copy of the certificate of personal seal impression issued by the J, which includes the following contents:

The assignee of the assignment of claims and the assignee of the transfer contract: J transferee: The foregoing transferor shall transfer all the rights of the receipt and notice as follows to the assignee on August 19, 2016.

- The following-(the entry of the third debtor to be assigned) and the entry of the name of the business operator whose business operator is the debtor number;

1. The transfer amount of K (representative: C) The amount of transfer of a building M on the off-Jacheon-gu L: the daily amount of million won; and

2. Determination of KRW 0 million as transfer amount in the case of Dbucheon-si; and

3. Transfer amount of O buildings and subparagraph 1 in Bupyeong-si Co., Ltd.: KRW 0 million in daily.

4. The purchase price of Q Q in Seoul Metropolitan Government: The price of Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government;

5. The transfer amount of the R in the case of the Gyeonggi-si in the bankruptcy resolution plan: The above transferor, August 19, 2016: J transferee: The LA in the case of the bankruptcy resolution plan.

D. On December 22, 2016, J has a notary public prepare a notarial deed for a loan for consumption of money with a loan amounting to KRW 100 million, even though the Plaintiff was only a claim for the purchase of goods amounting to KRW 15 million against J, and exercised the said notarial deed.