Judgment

It is recognized that the circumstances such as the defendant's acknowledgement of the crime of this case reflects his mistake, and that the defendant has no record of the same crime.

However, the crime of this case is that the defendant worked for an employee in an illegal game room installed with 90 prices for the game machine in the sea in which the defendant did not receive a classification, and the defendant prevented access to the game room by preparing for the CCTV installed outside the game room on behalf of the absent owner, and aids and abets the preparation for the business of the illegal game room, such as preventing the entrance of the game room, and preventing the control over the game room, and there is a need for strict punishment of social harm, such as promoting the general public's gambling spirit and impairing the will to work, and the game machine installed in the game room in this case has reached 90 places of business, and the size of the game machine installed in this case has reached the 90 places of business, and the responsibility of the defendant for the crime of the defendant A, even though the defendant committed the crime of this case is not easy, the defendant's punishment and fine for the crime of this case has not been imposed, the defendant's age, character and behavior, the defendant's motive and circumstances leading to the crime in this case, and the circumstances before and after the record of this case are unreasonable.

In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.