From January 15, 2008 to March 31, 2008, the Defendant committed an indecent act by inducing the Defendant’s sexual organ one time by inducing the Defendant to have the victim E (here, 31 years of age) to commit an indecent act against the female by using a cresh in which the wife E (here, f loan 203) is locked, at the time of the space between the Defendant and the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant committed an indecent act on the victim's kinship by force.

2. The Defendant’s assertion and judgment do not constitute an indecent act by force against the victim on the date and time stated in the indictment from the investigative agency to this court, and asserts that the Defendant denies the crime and acquitted him.

On October 26, 2012, the police investigation stated that the direct evidence that the defendant could recognize the victim's indecent act by force was the statement of the victim's court and investigative agency. In other words, on the following circumstances acknowledged by the record: (i) on October 26, 2012, the victim: (a) at the time of the police investigation, "the victim was sicked, broken off from a lock, and reported the victim was dried up, and the victim was dried up, and the victim was able to bring the victim's grandchildren back again on the part of the victim, and then bring the victim's grandchildren to the defendant's sexual intercourse again (in the investigation record 8 pages); (b) at the time of the investigation by the prosecution on February 25, 2013, the victim was dried up, and the victim was dried up to the part of the victim, and the victim was dried up to the part of the victim and the part of the victim, and the victim was dried up to both the victim's finger and the part of the victim.