However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On September 18, 2014, at around 09:58, the Defendant: (a) committed assault against the police officers, including, but not limited to, the police officers, who were the police officers of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, where the Defendant’s mother’s mother was living in, Da, and 112 reported the 112th day of the house; and (b) the E, a police officer of the Seoul Young Military Police Station, who was called to the site after receiving the report from the said D, and the police officer, who was the police officer of the Seoul Young Military Police Station, in order to listen to the details of the report from the said D.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of the police officer on the handling of the 112 reported case.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of victims;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor concerning the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (including the fact that an offense has been committed in a state of excessive appraisal due to problems, etc., the fact that the offense has been committed by contingency, the fact that a mistake has been recognized, and the violation