However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

[criminal power] On August 21, 2007, the defendant was sentenced to a fine of 1.5 million won for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Gwangju District Court on August 21, 2007. On October 19, 2007, the same court was sentenced to a fine of 2.5 million won for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving). On May 31, 201, the same court was sentenced to a fine of 2 million won for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license). In addition, the criminal records such as the violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) are more than four times.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On September 21, 2013, the Defendant driven B K7 cars while under the influence of alcohol without a vehicle driver’s license at a distance of about 500 meters from the front of the monthly valley market in the Gwangju Mine-gu to the front of the mountain street in the same Gu, from September 21, 2013.

2. Forgery of private signature, and the use of a false investigation or signature;

A. When the Defendant discovered a slope C belonging to the Gwangju Mine Police Station Investigation Division of the Traffic Accidents Investigation Team, which is under influence of alcohol on the roads prior to the Masan History on the roads prior to the same date as paragraph (1), he/she forged the signature of the above D with D’s signature on the notice of the result of the influence of alcohol driving under the PDA presented by the above C without authority for the purpose of exercising the influence of alcohol measurement after measuring it.

B. The Defendant’s above investigation and signature events

At the same time and at the same place as the foregoing, D's signature written on the screen was submitted to C by police officers who are not aware of the circumstances as a result of the PDA Driving Regulations, and used forged D's signature.

3. Forgery of private documents and the display of private documents;

A. The Defendant forged a private document under Article 2-A.

When it was discovered at the same time and place as above in the drinking Control, the police officer C prepared a report on the statement of the situation of the drinking driver presented by the police officer C without authority for the purpose of exercising it, and stated the name D in the name column.