If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

The Defendant is a person engaged in driving a taxi in K5 corporations.

On October 18, 2016, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 22:50, and made the left turn at the speed not verified by the front-down 1444, the Young-ri street street from the front-dong room of the road.

The location is the place where traffic control is carried out, and at the time, the victim D (W. 58) was driving the E FD car so that the victim D (W. 58) is straighten from the direction of the road driving to the two-lanes in the direction of the road driving, so there was a duty of care to check whether there are vehicles crossing by reducing speed or temporarily stopping the speed.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and caused the left-hand turn to the left-hand side of the damaged vehicle due to the negligence of violating the signal and shocked the front-hand side of the damaged vehicle.

In the end, the defendant and the passengers aboard the taxi were injured by the above negligence in need of medical treatment between three weeks and two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of D;

1. A survey report on actual conditions, map on the scene of an accident, etc.;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;