However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 15, 2012, around 22:45, the Defendant has a dispute with the victim E (the age of 60) seated in the Defendant’s seat at the “Dju shop” located in Heung-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, and the victim E (the age of 60).

B. In 2 times, the victim's head was fluored twice due to a fluor's disease, which is a dangerous object on the table, and the victim's head and body fluor continued to go out of the above main point and on several occasions due to a monar, which is a dangerous object.

As a result, the Defendant carried dangerous objects and inflicted injury on the victim, such as cutting down the body frame on the left side in need of treatment for about 8 weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The police statement of E and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of Part II of the written request for investigation report (where a statement of opinion is attached, etc. to the victim), and the written request for entrustment;

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigations under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act ( normal consideration in favor of the accused among the reasons for sentencing below);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following factors for sentencing have been repeatedly taken into consideration for the defendant);

1. Circumstances favorable to sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act for probation and community service order: The victim does not want the punishment by mutual consent with the defendant; the defendant is seriously against the defendant; the number of self-denunciation (the escape of the period is considered as the following disadvantageous circumstances): the suspended sentence is sentenced for the same kind of crime in 1994 and 2005; the victim was injured with a deadly weapon; the victim was injured with a deadly weapon; the escape was made after the occurrence of the crime in the case; the crime in the case of violent crime sentencing; the punishment shall be determined as ordered in consideration of all the conditions of the sentencing within the scope of the recommendation [the punishment shall be imposed] set forth in the sentencing guidelines for violent crime.