If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On May 4, 2011, from around 02:15 to May 13:00, 201, the Defendant asserted that D’s spouse F is the business owner, and D and F are the business owner.

At present, there are lawsuits for cancellation of the trial court on relief of unfair dismissal (Seoul High Court 2012Nu18136) and lawsuits for cancellation of the trial court on relief of unfair dismissal (Seoul Administrative Court 2012Guhap2931) filed by the defendant on the premise that F is a business owner, respectively, under the premise that F is a business owner, and the judgment dismissing the plaintiff's claim on the ground that F cannot be deemed a F in the first instance of the lawsuit that is premised on the premise that F is a business owner.

(Seoul Administrative Court 201Guhap38582). In the case of Seoul Administrative Court 2011Guhap38582, the victim was forced to attend the office after the victim was notified of dismissal and interfered with the victim's work by force, such as "I am son F son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Application of the witness D’s statement legislation

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;