At around 02:00 on June 22, 2013, the Defendant used the victim F (year 47) who was the victim of the victim F (age 47) who was the victim of E, by blocking the Defendant, and by cutting the victim’s left hand, committed assaulting the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Legal statement of witness F and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the field CCTV investigation;

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his/her defense counsel's assertion as to the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act (2) of the suspended sentence (300,000 won of fine, KRW 100,000 per day of confinement for recovery): The victim's daily act first induced the instant case; there were circumstances that may be taken into account such circumstances as the defendant committed the instant crime by contingently during the process of setting up against it; and the degree of damage is not significant). However, the defendant and his/her defense counsel did not pluck up the victim's hand in order to prevent the defendant from escape. However, they do not contain any plucking, and even so, they constitute a justifiable act that does not violate the social rules.

According to the evidence examined above, the victim and E, H, and G demanded the Defendant to find and hold room around 01:57 on June 22, 2013 at the terminal where the Defendant works. However, on the grounds that the Defendant was a gold-free day, he was faced with the Defendant’s flab, and H reported the Defendant’s flabing, and the Defendant reported the Defendant’s flabing to the police at around 01:59. G sent the victim and H, and the victim told the Defendant, from around 02:01 to around 02:0, the Defendant discarded the flabing.