When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

피고인은 2015. 2. 3. 09:50 경 아산시 둔포면 아산 밸리 동로 22에 있는 유성기업 주식회사 정비 팀에서 금속노조 충남 지부 유성기업 아산 지회 소속 노조원들과 삼보일 배 진행 중 피해자 B이 이를 쳐다본다는 이유로, 다수의 유성기업 노조원들 및 사 측 관계자들이 있는 가운데 피해자에게 “ 뭘 쳐다봐 씨 발 놈아, 살다, 살다 개 좆같은 새끼들 다 보겠네

“The term “assumed” means a large sound.

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to B;

1. Investigation report (the analysis of motion pictures submitted by the complainant B- Criminal Act A) (the application of Acts and subordinate statutes to suspect A);

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Criminal Procedure Act include the type and degree of the instant crime, the criminal records of the Defendant’s criminal punishment (limited to the records of minor fines of around 2008), the recognition of the Defendant’s crime, and other various circumstances shown at the trial of the instant case, including the Defendant’s age, sex, and environment, and the sentence as ordered.