2. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a person who operates a clock bank in Gangwon B.

1. No one shall provide game products that have not been rated for distribution or use by a person who occupies the point of providing game products for use by which they have not been rated;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, from May 19, 2014 to May 26, 2014, set up seven computers with “sparling games”, which are game products not classified between the Defendant and the Defendant, at the same spare room and provided many unspecified customers to use.

2. No one who uses or provides game products the contents of which are different from those of the game products the classification of which is obtained shall provide such game products for the distribution or use, or display or store such products for such purposes;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, unlike the contents of rating between May 12, 2014 and May 26, 2014, set up seven computers with a new and altered “nive game” to directly charge and collect money in a specific game account, and provided many unspecified customers to find out the same.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Written statements prepared in D;

1. Investigation reports (to attach the first written appraisal of game products);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Attachment of a second appraisal statement on game products);

1. Relevant Article on criminal facts, Articles 44 (1) 2, 32 (1) 1 (the point of providing a game product that has not been rated) of the Act on the Promotion of the Game Industry, Article 45 subparagraph 4 of the Act on the Promotion of the Game Industry, and Article 32 (1) 2 of the Act on the Promotion of the Game Industry (the point of providing a game product that is different from the game product rated, the choice of fines);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing of Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act is that the accused does not have the same criminal record and the period of the crime.