A. As to Plaintiff A, KRW 125,000,00 and its amount, Defendant F from September 6, 2016.

A. From July 2016 to September 2016, the Plaintiffs are those who entrusted Defendant E with a second class trading or leased money to Defendant E.

B. Defendant E works in Defendant G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant G”), and is a person entrusted with the trade of heavy vehicles or borrowed money from the Plaintiffs during the said period.

Defendant F is a person engaged in a secondhand trading business.

Defendant G is a company with the aim of high-class trading business.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1, 4 through 21, and purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. The person who actually controls and operates Defendant G is Defendant F, and Defendant E is an employee of Defendant F and G.

Defendant E, although Defendant E did not have the intent or ability to sell or purchase the used vehicles or repay the borrowed money, acquired money or used cars from the Plaintiffs in exchange for the borrowed money or borrowed money.

(1) The Plaintiff did not pay KRW 25,00,000,000 on a loan basis, even if the Plaintiff did not pay the purchase price of KRW 25,00,00,000 on a loan basis, and did not pay the loan of KRW 35,00,00 on a loan basis. ② The Plaintiff was paid KRW 25,00,000 from the Plaintiff, but did not deliver the loan of KRW 23,00,000 on a loan basis. ③ The Plaintiff did not pay KRW 23,00,000 on a loan basis, and did not receive KRW 49,50,000 on a loan basis. ④ Defendant EF, as a tort, Defendant EF, Defendant EF, and the Plaintiff’s damages for delay.

Even if not, Defendant E is jointly with Defendant F and G, each of the above amounts from the Plaintiffs.