However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 3, 2013, at around 22:10, the Defendant driven B Costex van under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.148% on the front of the national cargo located in the Kusidong of Kumi-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to reports on the situation of running a driving under the influence of alcohol, reports on the state of standing of a driver under the influence of alcohol, and records of the crackdown;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (2) 2 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Along with the history that the defendant has already been punished twice for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, etc., consideration of all the circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant commits a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and commits a violation, and is not a crime during the period of suspension of execution);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act or more of orders to provide community service and attend lectures;